Übersetzung und Analyse von Wörtern durch künstliche Intelligenz
Auf dieser Seite erhalten Sie eine detaillierte Analyse eines Wortes oder einer Phrase mithilfe der besten heute verfügbaren Technologie der künstlichen Intelligenz:
- wie das Wort verwendet wird
- Häufigkeit der Nutzung
- es wird häufiger in mündlicher oder schriftlicher Rede verwendet
- Wortübersetzungsoptionen
- Anwendungsbeispiele (mehrere Phrasen mit Übersetzung)
- Etymologie
tailored$93475$ - Übersetzung nach griechisch
![U.S. Ambassador to the U.N]] [[Samantha Power]] and [[Israeli President]] [[Reuven Rivlin]] wearing [[business wear]] suits as per their gender, 2016](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Ambassador Samantha Power Meets Israeli President Rivlin (24462661883).jpg?width=200 "U.S. Ambassador to the U.N]] [[Samantha Power]] and [[Israeli President]] [[Reuven Rivlin]] wearing [[business wear]] suits as per their gender, 2016")
![[[Angélica Rivera]] wearing a modern-day skirt suit](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Camino a la reunión con con el Presidente de la República Popular China, el Excmo. Sr. Xi Jinping. (8627337472).jpg?width=200 "[[Angélica Rivera]] wearing a modern-day skirt suit")
 – Dark Brown Pinstripe Suit.jpg?width=200 "thumb")
![A man dressed in a three-piece suit and [[bowler hat]].](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Gentleman in bowler.JPG?width=200 "A man dressed in a three-piece suit and [[bowler hat]].")
![Turkish President [[Recep Tayyip Erdoğan]] and U.S. President [[Barack Obama]] wearing Western-style business suits.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Obama and Erdogan.JPG?width=200 "Turkish President [[Recep Tayyip Erdoğan]] and U.S. President [[Barack Obama]] wearing Western-style business suits.")
 Tweed – Yellow-Olive-Taupe Windowpane Harris Tweed Suit.jpg?width=200 "thumb")
Definition
Wikipedia
Narrow tailoring (also known as narrow framing) is the legal principle that a law be written to specifically fulfill only its intended goals.
This phrase is most commonly invoked in constitutional law cases in the United States, such as First Amendment cases, or Equal Protection cases involving racial discrimination by creating racial distinctions. In the case Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), the United States Supreme Court held that:
Even in the limited circumstance when drawing racial distinctions is permissible to further a compelling state interest, government is still constrained under equal protection clause in how it may pursue that end: the means chosen to accomplish the government's asserted purpose must be specifically and narrowly framed to accomplish that purpose.
For affirmative action programs in higher education, they are only considered legal because they further the compelling state interest of creating diversity on university campuses. Federal courts would consider certain programs to be illegal if they exceeded the scope that would be required to fulfill the academic institution's goals.
